domingo, janeiro 08, 2006

simone de beauvoir was a clever and thoughtful woman


What do you think?

“if man is free to define for himself the conditions of a life which is valid in his own eyes, can he not choose whatever he likes and act however he likes? Dostoevsky asserted, “If God does not exist, everything is permitted.” Today’s believers use this formula for their own advantage. To re-establish man at the heart of his destiny is, they claim, to repudiate all ethics. However, far from God’s absence authorizing all license, the contrary is the case, because man is abandoned on the earth, because his acts are definitive, absolute engagements. He bears the responsibility for a world which is not the work of a strange power, but of himself, where his defeats are inscribed, and his victories as well. A God can pardon, efface, and compensate. But if God does not exist, man’s faults are inexpiable. If it is claimed that, whatever the case may be, this earthly stake has no importance, this is precisely because one invokes that inhuman objectivity which we declined at the start. One can not start by saying that our earthly destiny has or has not importance, for it depends upon us to give it importance. It is up to man to make it important to be a man, and he alone can feel his success or failure. And if it is again said that nothing forces him to try to justify his being in this way, then one is playing upon the notion of freedom in a dishonest way. The believer is also free to sin. The divine law is imposed upon him only from the moment he decides to save his soul. In the Christian religion, though one speaks very little about them today, there are also the damned. Thus, on the earthly plane, a life which does not seek to ground itself will be a pure contingency. But it is permitted to wish to give itself a meaning and a truth, and it then meets rigorous demands within its own heart.”

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anônimo said...

you should read Ismael by Daniel Quinn, the book we talked about on the way to the ranch. the main topic is very similar to this passage, but deals more in man's responsibility and relation to the earth itself.

-trey

9:01 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

oops. Ishmael, not Ismael

4:04 PM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

russell, i like this.

katy

3:33 PM  
Blogger Esteban said...

i think i will read ishmael..thanks for the reminder

7:50 PM  

Postar um comentário

<< Home